Week 6 Risk Factors Juvenile Offenders Literature Review

Week 6 Risk Factors Juvenile Offenders Literature Review

The primary goal of this literature review is to integrate concepts from four different content domains within the larger field of psychology. The four content domains should be chosen from previous coursework in this program. In this , students will review the findings in the individual empirical articles, organize the research in a meaningful way, evaluate the reliability, validity, and generalizability of the research findings, and present an integrated synthesis of the research that sheds new light on the topics within and across the four domains.

The result of a successful integrative literature review may be a significant contribution to a particular body of knowledge and, consequently, to research and practice. Therefore, before writing this literature review, substantive new research must be conducted via the Internet and within the UAGC Library for each of the four chosen domains. A minimum of six sources must be included for each of the four domains. Although content from literature reviews completed in prior courses within this program may be included, it may not constitute the total research for the individual domains addressed within this assignment. No more than four sources from previous literature reviews completed in this program may be utilized for this integrative review.

The headings listed below must be used within the paper to delineate the sections of content. These sections include the following: a clear introduction that provides a general review and organizes the research in a meaningful way; a discussion in which the evidence is presented through analysis, , and synthesis; and a conclusion in which the discussion is drawn together in a meaningful way, the claims of the introduction are brought to a logical closure, and new research is proposed.

Introduction

• Provide a conceptual framework for the review.
• Describe how the review will be organized. The questions below may be used to guide this section.
  • What are the guiding theories within the domains?
  • How are the domains connected?
  • Are there competing points of view across the domains?
  • Why is the integration of these domains important?
  • What is the history of these domains?
  • What are the related theories or findings?
• Describe how the literature was identified, analyzed, and synthesized.
• How and why was the literature chosen?
• What is your claim or thesis statement?

Discussion

• Provide the analysis, critique, and synthesis for the review.

Analysis

• Examine the main ideas and relationships presented in the literature across the four domains.
• Integrate concepts from the four different content domains within the larger field of psychology.
• What claim(s) can be made in the introduction?
• What evidence supports the claim(s) made in the introduction?

Critique 

• Evaluate the reliability, validity, and generalizability of the chosen research findings.
• How well does the literature represent the issues across the four domains?
• Identify the strengths and the key contributions of the .
• What, if any, deficiencies exist within the literature?
• Have the authors omitted any key points and/or arguments?
• What, if any, inaccuracies have been identified in the literature?
• What evidence runs contrary to the claims proposed in the introduction, and how might these be reconciled with the claims presented?
• Explain how the APA’s Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct might influence the reliability and/or generalizability of the chosen findings.
• Did the ethical issues influence the outcomes of the research?
• Were ethical considerations different across the domains?

Synthesis

• Integrate existing ideas with new ideas to create new knowledge and new perspectives.
• Describe the research that has previously been done across these domains, as well as any controversies or alternate opinions that currently exist.
• Relate the evidence presented to the major conclusions being made.
• Construct clear and concise arguments using evidence-based psychological concepts and theories to posit new relationships and perspectives on the topics within the domains.

Conclusion

• Provide a conclusion and present potential future considerations.
• State your final conclusion(s).
• Synthesize the findings described in the discussion into a succinct summary.
• What questions remain?
• What are the possible implications of your argument for existing theories and for everyday life?
• Are there novel theories and/or testable hypothesizes for future research?
• What do the overarching implications of the studies show?
• Where should the research go from this point to further the understanding of these domains and the greater study of psychology?

1

Topic is Risk Factors for Juvenile Offenders:

Resources

Domain 1: Psychopathology

Cohn, M., van Domburgh, L., Vermeiren, R., Geluk, C., & Doreleijers, T. (2012). Externalizing psychopathology and persistence of offending in childhood first-time arrestees. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 21(5), 243-251.

Colins, O. F., & Grisso, T. (2019). The relation between mental health problems and future violence among detained male juveniles. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, 13(1), 1-11.

DeLisi, M., Vaughn, M. G., Beaver, K. M., Wright, J. P., Hochstetler, A., Kosloski, A. E., & Drury, A. J. (2008). Juvenile sex offenders and institutional misconduct: The role of thought psychopathology. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 18(5), 292-305.

Imbach, D., Aebi, M., Metzke, C. W., Bessler, C., & Steinhausen, H. C. (2013). Internalizing and externalizing problems, depression, and self-esteem in non-detained male juvenile offenders. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, 7(1), 1-8.

Margari, F., Craig, F., Margari, L., Matera, E., Lamanna, A. L., Lecce, P. A., … & Carabellese, F. (2015). Psychopathology, symptoms of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, and risk factors in juvenile offenders. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, 11, 343.

Wojciechowski, T. W. (2020). PTSD as a risk factor for the development of violence among juvenile offenders: A group-based trajectory modeling approach. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 35(13-14), 2511-2535.

The resources selected for this domain mainly revolve around mental illness and its connection to juvenile offending. The validity of results in these articles is ensured through the use of standardized tools to assess mental illness. The mental illnesses considered include, among others, PTSD and ADHD. Criteria used in the articles is relevant to the American Psychiatric Association (APA) criteria. Regarding reliability, the six studies have been conducted with juvenile offenders in general conditions of offending. The findings are thus reproducible in other settings. Violence connection with mental health and thought psychopathology will work together to show the main triggers for juvenile offending. The sources in this domain will show the connection between mental health outcomes and risk of offending.

Domain 2: Social Psychology

Birckhead, T. R. (2012). Delinquent by reason of poverty. Wash. UJL & Pol’y, 38, 53.

Chung, H. L., & Steinberg, L. (2006). Relations between neighborhood factors, parenting behaviors, peer deviance, and delinquency among serious juvenile offenders.Developmental Psychology, 42(2), 319.

Duran-Bonavila, S., Vigil-Colet, A., Cosi, S., & Morales-Vives, F. (2017). How individual and contextual factors affects antisocial and delinquent behaviors: A comparison between young offenders, adolescents at risk of social exclusion, and a community sample. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1825.

Reid, S. E. (2017). The curious case of loners: Social isolation and juvenile incarceration. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 22(1), 180-195.

Van Raemdonck, L., & Seedat-Khan, M. (2017). Investigating the process of juvenile delinquency in Durban, South Africa: Insights from the Capability Approach. Youth Voice Journal.

Watts, S. J. (2018). ADHD symptomatology and criminal behavior during adolescence: Exploring the mediating role of school factors. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 62(1), 3-23.

This domain brings together social factors including poverty and social environment to discuss risk factors of offending during teenage. Validity is ensured through the exploration of alternative explanations for delinquent behavior in the social environment. The studies use measures of delinquency and social factors to assess the connection between the two.. All the resources are peer-reviewed and hence have high validity. Moreover, they are conducted in general social environments to which teenagers are exposed and hence the results are reproducible. The resources included here research poverty, school environment, neighborhood, and capability approach. Taken together, these resources cover the main social factors that affect children’s development and behavioral outcomes

Domain 3: Personality

Armenti, N. A., Snead, A. L., & Babcock, J. C. (2018). The role of trait anger in the relation between juvenile delinquency and intimate partner violence in adulthood. Crime & Delinquency, 64(5), 587-605.

Freeman, K. A., Dexter-Mazza, E. T., & Hoffmanl, K. C. (2005). Comparing personality characteristics of juvenile sex offenders and non-sex offending delinquent peers: A preliminary investigation. Sexual Abuse, 17(1), 3-12.

Glowacz, F., & Born, M. (2013). Do adolescent child abusers, peer abusers, and non-sex offenders have different personality profiles?. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 22(2), 117-125.

Kravtsov, O. G. (2020). The problem of personality development in juvenile offenders: A cultural-historical approach. Cultural-Historical Psychology, 16(1), 49-56.

Starikova, V. O., Debolskiy, M. G., & Oshevsky, D. S. (2017). Traits of antisocial personality of juvenile offenders. Psychology and Law, 7(4), 79-91.

Wojciechowski, T. (2021). Latent profile analysis of personality dimensions among juvenile offenders: Relevance for predicting offending seriousness. Crime & Delinquency, 67(2), 212-233.

Personality can be defined as the internal characteristics that affect manifested behavior through externalization. In connection to forensics psychology, the focus of this domain is to determine how internal factors affect or motivate certain behaviors. The validity of these resources is established through using established personality profiles to outline offenders’characteristics. These profiles have been developed in the past through rigorous studies and assessment. General personality profiles, trait anger, and antisocial personalities are the main areas of focus in this domain. The literature in this domain will work together to outline how certain anti-social personality traits may increase the risk of juvenile offending.

Domain 4: Intelligence

Falligant, J. M., Alexander, A. A., & Burkhart, B. R. (2017). Offence characteristics and cognitive functioning in juveniles adjudicated for illegal sexual behaviour. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 23(3), 291-299.

Frize, M., Kenny, D., & Lennings, C. (2008). The relationship between intellectual disability, indigenous status and risk of reoffending in juvenile offenders on community orders. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 52(6), 510-519.

Miyaguchi, K., & Shirataki, S. (2014). Executive functioning problems of juvenile sex offenders with low levels of measured intelligence. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 39(3), 253-260.

Najdowski, C. J., Bottoms, B. L., & Vargas, M. C. (2009). Jurors’ perceptions of juvenile defendants: The influence of intellectual disability, abuse history, and confession evidence. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 27(3), 401-430.

van der Put, C. E., Asscher, J. J., Stams, G. J. J. M., & Moonen, X. M. H. (2014). Differences between juvenile offenders with and without intellectual disabilities in the importance of static and dynamic risk factors for recidivism. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 58(11), 992-1003.

Werner, S. S., Hart, K. J., & Ficke, S. L. (2016). Intelligence score profiles of female juvenile offenders. Journal of PsychoeducationalAssessment, 34(3), 296-300.15608577

This domain is concerned with intellectual disability and the connection to juvenile offending. Specifically, the articles look at intellectual score profiles, executive, and cognitive functioning as predictors of juvenile behavior. Validity is ensured through the use of standardized tools and scales for intelligence scores such as IQ. The studies extend to responses by judges and jury regarding offencescommitted by juveniles with intellectual disabilities. The rationale for this collection of resources is to outline how intellectual disability may affect offending and the need for better psychological assessment when carrying out offender rehabilitation.

References

Armenti, N. A., Snead, A. L., & Babcock, J. C. (2018). The role of trait anger in the relation between juvenile delinquency and intimate partner violence in adulthood. Crime & Delinquency, 64(5), 587-605.

Birckhead, T. R. (2012). Delinquent by reason of poverty. Wash. UJL & Pol’y, 38, 53.

Chung, H. L., & Steinberg, L. (2006). Relations between neighborhood factors, parenting behaviors, peer deviance, and delinquency among serious juvenile offenders. Developmental Psychology, 42(2), 319.

Cohn, M., van Domburgh, L., Vermeiren, R., Geluk, C., & Doreleijers, T. (2012). Externalizing psychopathology and persistence of offending in childhood first-time arrestees. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 21(5), 243-251.

Colins, O. F., & Grisso, T. (2019). The relation between mental health problems and future violence among detained male juveniles. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, 13(1), 1-11.

DeLisi, M., Vaughn, M. G., Beaver, K. M., Wright, J. P., Hochstetler, A., Kosloski, A. E., & Drury, A. J. (2008). Juvenile sex offenders and institutional misconduct: The role of thought psychopathology. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 18(5), 292-305.

Duran-Bonavila, S., Vigil-Colet, A., Cosi, S., & Morales-Vives, F. (2017). How individual and contextual factors affects antisocial and delinquent behaviors: A comparison between young offenders, adolescents at risk of social exclusion, and a community sample. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1825.

Falligant, J. M., Alexander, A. A., & Burkhart, B. R. (2017). Offence characteristics and cognitive functioning in juveniles adjudicated for illegal sexual behaviour. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 23(3), 291-299.

Freeman, K. A., Dexter-Mazza, E. T., & Hoffmanl, K. C. (2005). Comparing personality characteristics of juvenile sex offenders and non-sex offending delinquent peers: A preliminary investigation. Sexual Abuse, 17(1), 3-12.

Frize, M., Kenny, D., & Lennings, C. (2008). The relationship between intellectual disability, indigenous status and risk of reoffending in juvenile offenders on community orders. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 52(6), 510-519.

Glowacz, F., & Born, M. (2013). Do adolescent child abusers, peer abusers, and non-sex offenders have different personality profiles?. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 22(2), 117-125.

Imbach, D., Aebi, M., Metzke, C. W., Bessler, C., & Steinhausen, H. C. (2013). Internalizing and externalizing problems, depression, and self-esteem in non-detained male juvenile offenders. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, 7(1), 1-8.

Kravtsov, O. G. (2020). The problem of personality development in juvenile offenders: A cultural-historical approach. Cultural-Historical Psychology, 16(1), 49-56.

Margari, F., Craig, F., Margari, L., Matera, E., Lamanna, A. L., Lecce, P. A., … & Carabellese, F. (2015). Psychopathology, symptoms of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, and risk factors in juvenile offenders. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, 11, 343.

Miyaguchi, K., & Shirataki, S. (2014). Executive functioning problems of juvenile sex offenders with low levels of measured intelligence. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 39(3), 253-260.

Najdowski, C. J., Bottoms, B. L., & Vargas, M. C. (2009). Jurors’ perceptions of juvenile defendants: The influence of intellectual disability, abuse history, and confession evidence. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 27(3), 401-430.

Reid, S. E. (2017). The curious case of loners: Social isolation and juvenile incarceration. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 22(1), 180-195.

Starikova, V. O., Debolskiy, M. G., & Oshevsky, D. S. (2017). Traits of antisocial personality of juvenile offenders. Psychology and Law, 7(4), 79-91.

van der Put, C. E., Asscher, J. J., Stams, G. J. J. M., & Moonen, X. M. H. (2014). Differences between juvenile offenders with and without intellectual disabilities in the importance of static and dynamic risk factors for recidivism. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 58(11), 992-1003.

Van Raemdonck, L., & Seedat-Khan, M. (2017). Investigating the process of juvenile delinquency in Durban, South Africa: Insights from the Capability Approach. Youth Voice Journal.

Watts, S. J. (2018). ADHD symptomatology and criminal behavior during adolescence: Exploring the mediating role of school factors. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 62(1), 3-23.

Werner, S. S., Hart, K. J., & Ficke, S. L. (2016). Intelligence score profiles of female juvenile offenders. Journal of PsychoeducationalAssessment, 34(3), 296-300.

Wojciechowski, T. (2021). Latent profile analysis of personality dimensions among juvenile offenders: Relevance for predicting offending seriousness. Crime & Delinquency, 67(2), 212-233.

Wojciechowski, T. W. (2020). PTSD as a risk factor for the development of violence among juvenile offenders: A group-based trajectory modeling approach. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 35(13-14), 2511-2535.  

Explanation & Answer length: 20 Pages