NRSE 4570 M2 Greene-Moton Minkler 2020 Cultural Competence or Cultural Humility
Invited Commentary
Keywords: cultural humility; cultural competence; health disparities; health education
W hen public health physician Melanie Tervalon and and clinic administrator Jane Murray-Garcia introduced the concept of
cultural humility to the fields of medicine and public health over 30 years ago, they catalyzed fascinating and continuing discourse on whether cultural humility is, in fact, more important than working to become “com- petent” in the cultures of those with whom we work and interact (Tervalon & Murray-Garcia, 1998). They defined cultural humility as “a lifelong commitment to self-evaluation and critique, to redressing power imbal- ances . . . and to developing mutually beneficial and non-paternalistic partnerships with communities on behalf of individuals and defined ” (p. 123). Furthermore, Tervalon and Murray-Garcia stressed that “culture” should not be limited to dimensions like racial or ethnic identity,but should include, for exam- ple, the culture of the physician or public health profes- sional, which also requires humility in dealing with patients, families, and communities.
The concept of cultural humility caught fire in fields including medicine, nursing, public health, community psychology, and social work. Indeed, by 2019, Tervalon and Murray-Garcia’s (1998) original article alone had been cited in over 1,500 peer reviewed articles. A wealth of tools including cultural humility trainings, curricula, and a 2012 videotape by health education professor Vivian Chavez (2012) also emerged and remain fre-
quently used in educating both current practitioners and the next generation of professionals in health promotion and related fields.
Yet the earlier concept of cultural competence con- tinues to have a far larger following. Selig, Tropiano, and Greene-Moton (2006) quoted a landmark definition from the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services Health Resources & Services Administration (original source no longer online):
Cultural competence comprises behaviors, atti- tudes, and policies that can come together on a con- tinuum that will ensure that a system, agency, program, or individual can function effectively and appropriately in diverse cultural interaction and set- tings. It ensures an understanding, appreciation, and respect of cultural differences and similarities within, among and between groups. (p. 249S)
Developed by social workers and counseling psychol- ogists in the early 1980s (Gallegos, 1982; Nadan, 2017), cultural competence soon became ubiquitous in the health and health care services literature as well, particu- larly following strong and early support for its importance from leading institutions like the Institute of Medicine (IOM) in two landmark books, Unequal Treatment: Confronting Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care (IOM, 2003a) and Who Will Keep the Public Healthy? (IOM, 2003b). Major health philanthropies, including the
884912HPPXXX10.1177/1524839919884912Health Promotion PracticeGreene-Moton, Minkler / Cultural Competence or Cultural Humility research-article2019
1Community Ethics Review Board, Community-Based Organizations Partners, Flint, MI, USA 2University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA
Cultural Competence or Cultural Humility? Moving Beyond the Debate
Ella Greene-Moton1
Meredith Minkler, DrPH, MPH2
Authors’ Note: Address correspondence to Meredith Minkler, Professor Emerita / Professor in the Graduate Group, Community Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of California Berkeley, 168 Highland Boulevard, Berkeley, CA 97408, USA; e-mail: mink@berkeley.edu.
Greene-Moton and Minkler / CUlTURAl COMPETENCE OR CUlTURAl HUMIlITY 143
Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (McGee-Avila, 2018) and the W. K. Kellogg Foundation, and large medical institutions, led by Kaiser Permanente, also took up the call, with Kaiser’s Institute for Culturally Competent Care (Chong, 2002) quickly heralded as a national model.
In our personal lives and in our work with communi- ties, health professionals, and students in public health and health care, we see substantial complementarity and synergy between the concepts and practice of cultural humility and cultural competence. We now briefly describe the continuing controversy over the merits of the two concepts and make the case for ending the debate and instead embracing a both/and approach as critical to our thinking, our practice and our lives in communi- ties and societies that are increasingly diverse along multiple dimensions.
>>WHy tHe Controversy?
As noted earlier, when the concept of cultural compe- tence gained widespread attention in public health and medicine in the 1980s and 1990s, it quickly landed an important place in health promotion and health education practice. Kaiser Permanente’s Institute for Culturally Competent Care created and widely distributed easily accessed manuals on culturally competent care with and for use by health professionals with five diverse racial/ ethnic and other groups (e.g., lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender populations; people with disabilities). Trainings in cultural competence and special sessions at the annual meetings of organizations, including the Society for Public Health Education and the American Public Health Association, were among the many ways in which concept dissemination and implementation spread.
Within academic public health, the first university class in this area “Cultural Competence to Eliminate Health Disparities,” was offered in 2002 in the University of Michigan, Flint’s Department of Public Health and Health Education (Selig et al., 2006), and soon was being offered three times per year to a total of 200 students annually. The course quickly became required for all undergraduate and graduate public health students, including those in premed and health administration, and remains a popular elective, as well, for students in biol- ogy, social work, and other fields (S. Selig, personal com- munication, May 19, 2019). The University of Michigan Flint course was followed by numerous others, as well as modules and intensive trainings in public health and medical schools, nursing, and ancillary health and social professions across and beyond the United States. Thousands of articles, book chapters, and Web resources on cultural competence in health promotion and related fields also were, and continue to be, developed to serve
a wide range of stakeholders. For example, the Office of Minority Health (see https://minorityhealth.hhs.gov/) has been providing online education in cultural competence through the Think Cultural Health initiative since 2004, offering courses and continuing education for a variety of professions. The courses are free and include content designed for (1) disaster and emergency personnel, (2) nurses, (3) oral health professionals, (4) physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants, (5) promotores de salud, and—new in 2019—(6) behavioral health profes- sionals (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Minority Health, 2019).
Yet, despite its wide dissemination and use in educa- tion and , the notion of cultural competence has continued to cause some uneasiness, in part because of the growing understanding that we cannot ever be truly competent in another’s culture (Chavez, 2018; Isaacson, 2014; Minkler, Pies, & Hyde, 2012; Murray-Garcia & Tervalon, 2014), making the term itself misleading. The word “competence” also was described as problematic by some individuals and communities for whom it implies a top-down approach, with one entity (often including some highly educated and privileged mem- bers of a given racial or other group) deciding what con- tent should be included and which benchmarks or criteria should be used to assess competence for their group(s). Cultural competence also is described by some as too binary a construct, implying that if one is not culturally competent, he or she is implicitly incompe- tent, and perhaps not equipped to interact professionally with members of particular groups (Chavez, 2012, 2018).
As illustrated above, however, many describe cultural competence in extremely positive terms, with the IOM naming it one of eight new content areas (along with infor- matics and genomics) in which all schools of public health should be offering training (, 2003b). Furthermore, scholars have argued that the more nuanced understand- ing of culturally competent public health professionals can itself contribute to individual and community control over and participation in decision making (Cerezo, Galceran, Soriano, & Moral, 2014; Taylor-Ritzler et al., 2008). Finally, in his recent and in-depth reflective anal- ysis of the concepts of cultural humility and cultural com- petence, Danso (2018) argues that cultural competence already incorporates the concept of cultural humility, stressing as it does “the need to question one’s assump- tions, beliefs and biases,” and other tenets at the heart of cultural humility and antioppressive practice such as “respect for difference, reducing power differentials, building partnerships, and learning from clients” (Danso, 2018, p. 415; see also Ben-Ari & Strier, 2010).
In our view, and as Isaacson (2014) and others note as well, cultural competence is not something we
144 HEAlTH PROMOTION PRACTICE / January 2020
achieve or fail to achieve but rather a reminder to con- tinue to strive to know more about communities of all types with which we work or interact. Together with the concept and embodied practice of deep cultural humil- ity, it provides health educators and other public health professionals with some of our most important tools in working with diverse individuals, groups, and commu- nities in today’s complex world. Below we provide examples from our own lives and/or public health prac- tice, in which the need for both cultural competence and cultural humility was powerfully experienced.
>>ella Greene-Moton
