Critical Analysis and Evaluation

Want create site? With you can do it easy.

DHA 715 WEEK 8 Critical Analysis and Evaluation

Critical Analysis and Evaluation

As you progress through your program and move into the professional world, your ability to be a good consumer of research becomes increasingly important. This means understanding research in terms of evaluation, application, and creation (Rodriguez & Toews, 2005). The Analysis, Evaluation, Synthesis (AES) model was introduced in the ACCESS curriculum as a tool to help you develop higher-order critical thinking skills. The following assignment provides an opportunity to enhance your ability to analyze and evaluate research literature in Health Care. Note that all research analysis and evaluation within this assignment will contain components that will be included, or are a part of, your dissertation. You will advance to synthesis when completing the literature review for your dissertation.

As you complete this assignment, also consider assumptions, assertions, and inferences made by the author and yourself in relation to each of the content specific research components within your discipline.

Review two journal articles (one qualitative and one quantitative) from the Electronic Reserve Readings (ERR) list.

Write a 1,050- to 1,400-word paper analyzing and evaluating the essential research components of an introduction included in the two journal articles you selected to review. Critical Analysis and Evaluation

Consider the following questions as you complete your critical analysis and evaluation of the journal articles you selected:

  • Components of an introduction should include such things as a problem statement, purpose of the study, and research questions. What are the characteristics of a good problem statement? Provide examples of evidence that support the significance of the problem.
  • How does the problem statement align with the research questions? Provide examples of how the problem contributes to professional knowledge and practice.
  • Is the research purpose logical? What constitutes a good research question? How do the research questions meet those requirements? Identify how the research questions tie directly to the purpose. Are they clear, specific, and unambiguous?
  • How might you revise or improve the research questions to support the scope of the study? How do the research questions delineate the scope of the study? Identify any common themes or errors identified in any of the research questions.
  • How does the introduction explain the contents of the study? How does the introduction set the stage for the study and direct the reader to the purpose? How does the introduction provide a clear and valid representation of what will be found in the remainder of the study? Does the introduction clearly reflect the study and its relationship to the proposed problem and purpose? If so, how?

Describe the findings of your analysis and evaluation.

Explain the steps you took to analyze and evaluate the research components of the introduction. What insight did you gain from this process that will help you to develop the introduction of your dissertation?

Format your Critical Analysis and Evaluation paper according to APA guidelines.

Submit your assignment to the Assignment Files tab.

DHA 731 WEEK 2 Critical Analysis and Evaluation

As you progress through your program and move into the professional world, your ability to be a good consumer of research becomes increasingly important. This means understanding research in terms of evaluation, application, and creation (Rodriguez & Toews, 2005). The Analysis, Evaluation, and Synthesis (AES) model was introduced in the ACCESS curriculum as a tool to help you develop higher-order critical thinking skills.

The following assignment provides an opportunity to enhance your ability to analyze and evaluate research literature from the healthcare administration discipline. Note that all research analysis and evaluation within this assignment will contain components that will be included, or are a part of, your dissertation. You will advance to synthesis when completing the literature review for your dissertation.

As you complete this assignment, also consider assumptions, assertions, and inferences made by the author and yourself in relation to each of the content specific research components within your discipline.

Review two journal articles (one qualitative and one quantitative) from the Week 2 Electronic Reserve Readings.

Write a 1,050- to 1,400-word paper analyzing and evaluating the essential research components of an introduction included in the two journal articles you selected to review.

Consider the following questions as you complete your critical analysis and evaluation of the journal articles you selected:

  • Components of an introduction should include such things as a problem statement, purpose of the study, and research questions. What are the characteristics of a good problem statement? Provide examples of evidence that support the significance of the problem.
  • How does the problem statement align with the research questions? Provide examples of how the problem contributes to professional knowledge and practice.
  • Is the research purpose logical? What constitutes a good research question? How do the research questions meet those requirements? Identify how the research questions tie directly to the purpose. Are they clear, specific, and unambiguous?
  • How might you revise or improve the research questions to support the scope of the study?  How do the research questions delineate the scope of the study? Identify any common themes or errors identified in any of the research questions.
  • How does the introduction explain the contents of the study? How does the introduction set the stage for the study and direct the reader to the purpose? How does the introduction provide a clear and valid representation of what will be found in the remainder of the study? Does the introduction clearly reflect the study and its relationship to the proposed problem and purpose? If so, how?

Describe the findings of your analysis and evaluation.

Explain the steps you took to analyze and evaluate the research components of the introduction. What insight did you gain from this process that will help you to develop the introduction of your dissertation?

Format your paper according to APA guidelines.

Click the Assignment Files tab to submit your paper.

DHA 733 WEEK 2 Critical Analysis and Evaluation #3

As you progress through your program and move into the professional world, your ability to evaluate, apply, and create research becomes increasingly important (Rodriguez & Toews, 2005). The Analysis, Evaluation, Synthesis (AES) model was introduced in the ACCESS curriculum as a tool to help you develop higher-order critical thinking skills. This final assignment in the critical analysis and evaluation series provides an opportunity to further develop your ability to analyze and evaluate research literature in your field. Note that all research analysis and evaluation within this assignment will promote skills that are transferrable to your dissertation. You will advance to synthesis when completing the literature review for your dissertation.

Read two journal articles (one qualitative and one quantitative) from the Electronic Reserve Readings.

Write a 1,050- to 1,400-word paper analyzing and evaluating the methodology, results, and conclusion for each article and the consideration of the ethical treatment and protection of human subjects in the content articles provided in the Electronic Reserve Readings.

Consider the following questions and the criteria in the relevant sections of the practitioner Dissertation Criteria and Rating Scale (DCRS) as you complete your critical analysis and evaluation of the journal articles you reviewed. Explain the steps you took to analyze and evaluate these research components.

  • How did the researcher(s) establish the stages, theoretical/conceptual framework, elements, and appropriateness of data collection? What data collection procedures were used?
  • How are ethical considerations for data collection, analysis, and reporting described? How could ethical treatment and protection of human subjects have been improved or made clearer to readers?
  • How was the data analysis aligned to the method and design of the study? How did the analysis and presentation of the results support the claims or conclusions stated in the research study? How did the theoretical or conceptual framework used help provide a lens for the researcher reviewing the results of the study?
  • How was the generalization supported based on the design of the study? How was the scope of the generalization of the findings presented?

As you complete this assignment, also consider assumptions, assertions, and inferences made by the author and yourself in relation to each of the content-specific research components within your discipline. What insight have you gained from this process that will help you to develop these sections of your dissertation?

Describe the findings of your analysis and evaluation.

Format your paper according to APA guidelines.

Submit your assignment to the Assignment Files tab.

DHA 715 WEEK 7 Integrating Ethics and Leadership

Scenario: Peer Customer Assessment (PCA) rounds have received national recognition as a best practice. PCA rounds are conducted six times a month by the health care organization’s leadership to establish face-to-face connections with staff and patients. PCA participants visit two units to discuss the patient experience and resolve any issues that the patient has encountered during his or her care. PCA rounds provide leadership with an opportunity to check in with staff throughout the organization and observe as they practice patient-centered care. Benefits of PCA rounds include opportunities for leadership to listen to patients and staff, assist in solving problems, and improve systems.

Due to an expanded leadership group, PCA sessions have become too large to be effective. Leadership seeks recommendations on alternate activities to fulfill PCA objectives.

Write a 350- to 700-word executive summary in which you recommend three appropriate alternative activities to fulfill PCA objectives.

Explain your rationale for each of the three recommendations.

Include at least three scholarly references to support your recommendations.

Format your work according to APA guidelines.

Submit your assignment to the Assignment Files tab.

Did you find apk for android? You can find new and apps.
Calculate the price
Make an order in advance and get the best price
Pages (550 words)
$0.00
*Price with a welcome 15% discount applied.
Pro tip: If you want to save more money and pay the lowest price, you need to set a more extended deadline.
We know how difficult it is to be a student these days. That's why our prices are one of the most affordable on the market, and there are no hidden fees.

Instead, we offer bonuses, discounts, and free services to make your experience outstanding.
How it works
Receive a 100% original paper that will pass Turnitin from a top essay writing service
step 1
Upload your instructions
Fill out the order form and provide paper details. You can even attach screenshots or add additional instructions later. If something is not clear or missing, the writer will contact you for clarification.
Pro service tips
How to get the most out of your experience with CheapNursingWriter
One writer throughout the entire course
If you like the writer, you can hire them again. Just copy & paste their ID on the order form ("Preferred Writer's ID" field). This way, your vocabulary will be uniform, and the writer will be aware of your needs.
The same paper from different writers
You can order essay or any other work from two different writers to choose the best one or give another version to a friend. This can be done through the add-on "Same paper from another writer."
Copy of sources used by the writer
Our college essay writers work with ScienceDirect and other databases. They can send you articles or materials used in PDF or through screenshots. Just tick the "Copy of sources" field on the order form.
Testimonials
See why 20k+ students have chosen us as their sole writing assistance provider
Check out the latest reviews and opinions submitted by real customers worldwide and make an informed decision.
Business Studies
Thank you!
Customer 452451, November 27th, 2022
Business Studies
Job well done. Finish paper faster than expected. Thank you!
Customer 452451, October 3rd, 2022
Architecture, Building and Planning
The assignment was well written and the paper was delivered on time. I really enjoyed your services.
Customer 452441, September 23rd, 2022
Theology
Job well done and completed in a timely fashioned!
Customer 452451, November 18th, 2022
English 101
Very good job. I actually got an A
Customer 452443, September 25th, 2022
Nursing
The paper was EXCELLENT. Thank you
Customer 452449, September 23rd, 2022
Psychology
Thanks a lot the paper was excellent
Customer 452453, October 26th, 2022
Anthropology
excellent loved the services
Customer 452443, September 23rd, 2022
Anthropology
Excellent services will definitely come back
Customer 452441, September 23rd, 2022
11,595
Customer reviews in total
96%
Current satisfaction rate
3 pages
Average paper length
37%
Customers referred by a friend
OUR GIFT TO YOU
15% OFF your first order
Use a coupon FIRST15 and enjoy expert help with any task at the most affordable price.
Claim my 15% OFF Order in Chat